Check out our NEW website. Click here!


Let’s defend traditional marriage

Rev . Fr. Russell Bantiles

Cogito

A “DUMP Starbucks” campaign is circulating in the World Wide Web. The reason? Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz, in an annual shareholders’ meeting, allegedly “sent a clear message to anyone who supports traditional marriage over gay marriage: we don’t want your business”. Reports say that he told a shareholder who supports traditional marriage to sell his shares and invest in some other company.

If this is true (and I think the news reporter has no reason to be inventing), then we should also say to Starbucks here in Davao: “we don’t want your coffee”.

In the US Supreme Court this week, the legal battle over gay marriage reached its height as the highest court deliberated on two cases that—the Boston Globe says—“could dramatically reshape the debate”. The same source also noted that public support for gay marriage is “at an all-time high” with 58% of Americans favoring gay marriage while only 36% opposing it.

If the truth could be determined by statistics, then, the true meaning of marriage would eventually be modified.

But no statistics or Supreme Court pronouncement could change the objective truth on marriage. Since time immemorial, civil and religious laws alike are unanimous in holding that marriage, by nature, is between man and woman, even though, at times both laws do not agree on whether marriage should be monogamous or not. In maintaining this truth, these positive laws simply echo the truth on marriage contained in the natural law, which, in turn, is a reflection of the divine law. This is why, man, in trying to modify these positive laws, is simply going against nature, and eventually, is going against the will of God.

“Without the Creator the creature would disappear… When God is forgotten…, the creature itself grows unintelligible” (Gaudium et spes, 36).

Gaudium et spes, in this sense, is prophetic. When reference to God and to God’s design for marriage and family is taken away, naturally, human family would become unintelligible. It would very soon disappear. Everybody recognizes the morally, emotionally and psychologically harmful effects of divorce, parents’ separation and single parenthood to the growth of children. Can we afford to add the same-sex marriage to this list?

In the Philippines, we must sound the alarm! Not a few senatorial candidates maintain an explicit positive stand on same-sex marriage. Others, while not explicit in their opposition, are not really against it.

Advocates of gay marriage insist on their rights to marry and form a family. But is it also their rights to modify the long and widely held definition of marriage and deprive others, especially the young generation, of this truth? Our freedom (rights) ends where the freedom (rights) of others begins!

In his opposition to the Argentinian government’s support for a gay marriage bill, Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio (now Pope Francis) said: “Let’s not be naive: this isn’t a simple political fight, it’s an attempt to destroy God’s plan”.

In defending traditional marriage from wicked attacks like that of Starbucks, we are actually defending God’s plan!

Thanks for rating this! Now tell the world how you feel - .
How does this post make you feel?
  • Excited
  • Fascinated
  • Amused
  • Bored
  • Sad
  • Angry

A word from the editor:

Intelligent discussions and exchange of views on issues are encouraged among our readers. Anyone can post comments or feedback about the news, features or stories uploaded in this site. However, the editorial board reserves the right to edit comments for clarity and brevity. The use of foul language, personal attacks or hate campaign on a person or an institution is not tolerated in this site. Likewise, promoting one's own agenda or interests (such as those that are commercial or political) through this site is discouraged, hence will be deleted.

2 Responses to Let’s defend traditional marriage

  1. Significant problems with this article came to mind, especially as it begins with untrue and misleading statements. Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz did not say he chose to endorse same-gender relationships OVER those between a man and a woman. He simply supports the diverse people he employs. In his own words, “We employ over 200,000 people in this company, and we want to embrace diversity. Of all kinds.” “If you feel, respectfully, that you can get a higher return than the 38% you got last year, it’s a free country. You can sell your shares in Starbucks and buy shares in another company. Thank you very much.”

    As many are beginning to understand and realize, loving and committed relationships do actually happen between adults who are of the same gender just the same as they occurs between a man and a woman. All consenting adults have the freedom and right to follow their heart, and to pursue the happiness in life they have found. It is beautiful to be loved and to love in return. Who am I do deny them this basic human emotion.

    Who actually created THE one and only definition of “TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE” which some try to so zealously defend? What is the source of that written definition of “TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE”? If the source is biblical scriptures, study further to discover other biblical definitions of ‘marriage’ or relationships, some of which seem not so acceptable in today’s society: man+woman, man+wife+concubines, man+woman+woman’s property, man+woman+woman+woman (polygamy), man+brother’s widow, rapist+his forced victim, male soldier+prisoner of war, male slave+female slave.

    Finally, we can ask ourselves, “Who am I to try to prevent two loving and committed people from building a beautiful life together?” Do you really want to be JUDGE on this, remembering that the Bible tells us that’s not our job. We don’t have the job of judging others, right? You may never totally agree with same-sex marriage, but let us everyone love and support instead of hate. Now go tell a same-sex couple how much you admire their commitment to each other!

    Bruce Wyatt
    April 6, 2013 at 9:46 pm
    Reply

  2. Let’s be together in this fight!

    rod antonio
    April 7, 2013 at 8:43 pm
    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *